In-House Heartworm and Tick-Borne Disease Tests

ticks.png

In-House Combination (Four-way) Heartworm and Tick-Borne Disease Tests: A Comparison

For dogs in some parts of the country, tick exposure (and risk of tick-borne diseases such as Lyme, Erhlichia, and Anaplasma) is a concern. Some infections can cause serious illness or even chronic disease.

Last week, we discussed some of the most commonly used in-house heartworm tests. But it’s important to remember that there are also combination heartworm tests available, which also test for common tick-borne diseases.

Depending on the risks in your area, it may make sense to screen canine patients for tick-borne diseases whenever routine or yearly heartworm testing is performed. These tests might also be good for screening patients who are symptomatic.

Here are two of the most common combination (sometimes referred to as “four-way”) heartworm and tick-borne disease tests used in-house by veterinarians…

IDEXX SNAP 4Dx Plus Test

IDEXX claims their test provides accurate results with reference laboratory quality technology. The test requires 3 drops of sample, and results are ready in 8 minutes. 

The six diseases that the SNAP 4Dx tests for are: 

  • Heartworms.

  • Lyme (Borrelia burgdorferi) infection.

  • Ehrlichia canis and Ehrlichia ewingii.

  • Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Anaplasma platys.

There is also a SNAP Pro Analyzer available, a device that saves time by automatically activating a SNAP test, reading and interpreting the test at the correct time, and adding results automatically to the medical record. 

Abaxis/Zoetis VetScan FLEX4 Rapid Test

The advertised benefits of the Abaxis (now a part of Zoetis) test are room temperature storage, a 1-year shelf life, and is very simple to use. The product information also states that the test can distinguish true Lyme disease exposure from Lyme vaccination.

The test requires 2 drops of sample and can be read in 8 minutes.

The FLEX4 tests for seven diseases, which are:

  • Heartworms.

  • Lyme (Borrelia burgdorferi) infection.

  • Ehrlichia canis, Ehrlichia chaffeensis, and Ehrlichia ewingii.

  • Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Anaplasma platys.

Similar to IDEXX, this company also offers an automatic reader—the VETSCAN VUE—to save time for veterinary technicians. Zoetis also advertises 24/7 technical support and confirmation testing (always available for heartworm, and on a case-by-case basis for tick-borne diseases).

A Few More Considerations

There is a lot of debate as to whether or not four-way tests should be used to screen healthy patients annually, versus just using a heartworm test by itself. The reason has a lot to do with the possibility of false positives.

Additionally, it’s important to know that the heartworm component tests for antigen, while the other infectious disease components test for antibodies.

This means a positive test for a tick-borne disease could potentially indicate a past exposure rather than current clinical disease. 

Some practitioners find that this can waste time—for the veterinary team and pet owner alike—and potentially make a client worry needlessly when their pet is actually healthy.

On the other hand, some practitioners feel that a positive result (one that indicates previous exposure in a currently healthy dog) opens the door to a conversation about the importance of tick control.

The best answer to these considerations will vary from practice to practice; it may be best decision based on the risk of tick-borne diseases in your area.

For example, the test may be more useful for screening in Lyme-endemic parts of the country. To determine the risk in your area, consider checking resources such as the CAPC’s Parasite Prevalence Maps.

Also, check with other practitioners in your area and see if your state board or state veterinary organization has resources or information available.

Follow-up testing can be a very useful option, especially for any positive or negative results that don’t fit the clinical picture, and to determine the best next steps for an individual patient.

Details and specifics of these tests may evolve over time. So, it’s important to check directly with the company for the most up-to-date information before making a purchase. Also, check for any special deals (or stipulations such as minimum purchase requirements) prior to finalizing a purchase decision.

Dr+Tammy.jpeg
, , ,

In-House Heartworm Tests: A Comparison Veterinary Guide

, , ,
in-housr.png

The American Heartworm Society (AHS) recommends annual testing for heartworm disease in canine patients. While heartworm testing in cats can be trickier than in dogs, the AHS also recommends testing cats before starting them on heartworm prevention, to establish a baseline for each patient.

Heartworm disease can be a risk in just about any state in the US. Even in states that see less mosquito activity or have not been well-known for heartworm risk, there is still some possibility of exposure as more and more dogs from heartworm-prevalent areas travel with their owners, potentially exposing the local mosquito populations. 

Should Heartworm Testing Be Done In-House?

As with many diagnostic tests, a veterinarian has the option of performing the test in their practice or sending a blood sample to an outside lab for analysis—or a combination of both.

For example, sending blood to an outside lab might make sense for healthy patients who are having a wellness bloodwork panel performed at their routine checkup.

Many standard bloodwork panels include a heartworm test, so it may make sense—financially for the client, and to save time for the veterinary team—to do the heartworm test at the lab since the blood sample is already being sent out.

However, prices and bloodwork panel options vary depending on the company and contracts/deals obtained, so be sure to compare the prices at your own clinic.

On the other hand, sometimes it makes sense to do a heartworm test in-house. For example, maybe a patient is symptomatic, and the veterinarian and pet owner both want an answer right away.

Or, maybe the client can only do basic care—vaccines and a heartworm test before starting heartworm prevention. For that client, it may make sense to do an in-house test so they can receive the results right away and know they can safely begin their dog’s prevention.

Here are some of the in-house heartworm tests available to veterinarians…

IDEXX SNAP Heartworm RT Test

IDEXX claims their test provides reference laboratory quality technology, for accurate results even with a low heartworm burden.

Their improved test sensitivity comes from a technology called “bidirectional flow,” which gives the sample two chances to bind to antibodies during the test, and from amplification. And specificity comes from a wash step that helps remove debris from the result window.

Abaxis VetScan and Zoetis Witness Heartworm Rapid Tests

Abaxis (now a part of Zoetis) offers a very simple-to-use test. It requires just one drop of blood and two drops of buffer, with no need to physically snap the test.

The company advertises that their product has a 12-month shelf life and does NOT need to be refrigerated. It also has a spot to write the patient’s name, to ensure there’s no mix-up of results if performing many tests in a short time frame.

Because of the non-refrigerated storage and the ease of writing a patient’s name on the test, this rapid test might be a good option for mobile or high-volume practices.

The Zoetis Witness test is very similar to the VetScan, and Zoetis sells each one in different quantities. For practices that mostly send their samples out to a lab, it may make sense to order the Witness test, which is available to be ordered in smaller quantities, so the tests don’t expire before a veterinary practice uses all of them.

Heska Solo Step Heartworm Test

The Heska test is also supposed to be simple to use, requiring 3 drops of blood and no need to snap the test. One advantage that Heska advertises is free confirmatory testing at their lab for positive results on the in-house test. This test can also conveniently be stored at room temperature.

There are separate versions of the test available for canines and felines, with the feline test evaluating for heartworm antibody rather than antigen.

A Few More Considerations

In-house tests are great options for screening for canine patients. However, any positive in-house test should be followed up with additional testing. This would usually involve confirming the positive test at an outside lab, and doing microfilaria testing. It’s important to have this additional confirmation and information prior to beginning any treatment.

Testing for cats is more complicated, too

Since heartworm-positive cats are more likely than dogs to be negative on an antigen test, an antibody test is the test of choice for them. However, antibody testing must be taken into account with the clinical picture and additional testing, since it documents exposure and is therefore not necessarily indicative of a current infestation.

Details and specifics of these tests may evolve over time. It’s important to check directly with the company for the most up-to-date information before making a purchase.

And finally, consider additional factors such as whether a special deal is available on these rapid in-house tests if you are already purchasing other equipment (like a hematology or chem analyzer, for example) from the same company. It may make financial sense to stick with the same brand. Be sure to check for any stipulations (like a minimum number of tests per month) in the contract, though. Also consider if it would make sense for your practice to do a combination test—which often features testing for Lyme, Anaplasma, and Ehrlichia in addition to heartworm—based on the risk in your local area.

Dr+Tammy.jpeg

With all these factors in mind, the best test for each individual practice varies, depending on their unique needs. Doing research, and asking for opinions from colleagues who have used the tests, can help with making this important decision.

Written by: Dr. Tammy Powell, DVM